(PS) James v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20252:18-cv-00180California6,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL JAMES, No. 2:18-cv-00180-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. TENTATIVE PRETRIAL ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 10, 2025, the court conducted a final pretrial conference in this case. Plaintiff appeared at the hearing in pro per and attorney Jonathan B. Paul appeared as counsel for defendants. Having considered the parties’ pretrial statements and the views of the parties as expressed at the conference, the court issues this tentative pretrial order. Plaintiff Daniel James brings this civil rights action against defendants Sacramento County, Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department, McMahon, Lee, E. Meier, C. Robinson, Pitto, Vlasak, P. Rivera, Scott R. Jones, Ramos Quintanilla, Gleason, Parker, Brown, and Williams, asserting claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (TAC) alleges he was repeatedly falsely arrested, subjected to excessive use of force, denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.