Shelton

Shelton v. Wayfair, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20252:24-cv-01541California2,688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE SHELTON, No. 2:24-cv-01541-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER WAYFAIR LLC; DANNY DOE; FRANK DOE; JOE DOE; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff George Shelton’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 4.) Defendant Wayfair LLC (“Wayfair”), Danny Payne (“Payne”), and Joe Giguere (“Giguere”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 14.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, a 47-year-old Black male, began working for Wayfair as a Material Handler sometime in October 2021. (ECF No. 4 at 10.) Plaintiff alleges he was an exemplary employee evidenced by the fact that he had never been written up or counseled with respect to his performance. (Id. at 10–11.) Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.