People v. Andrade CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 2025G063984California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

DISCUSSION

Effective January 1, 2019, Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.) (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015; Senate Bill 1437) amended the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine as it relates to murder “‘to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life.’” (People v. Lewis (2021) 11 Cal.5th 952, 959 (Lewis).) Senate

3 Since Andrade’s 2019 resentencing petition is not at issue in

this appeal, our record does not contain this petition, the corresponding briefs filed by the parties, or the trial court’s statement of decision in respect to the 2019 petition.

3 Bill 1437 also created procedures “for convicted murderers who could not be convicted under the law as amended to retroactively seek relief.” (Lewis, at p. 957.) The Legislature subsequently extended relief to defendants convicted of attempted murder based on the natural and probable consequences doctrine. (Sen. Bill No. 775 (2021–2022 Reg. Sess.); Stats. 2021, ch. 551, § 2.) The process begins when a defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.