118 Ava, LLC v. Pauline Hunter
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202522-56115California622 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
118 AVA, LLC, No. 22-56115
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-08048-DDP-JPR v.
PAULINE CLAY HUNTER; MEMORANDUM*
CHRISTOPHER HUNTER,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 13, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Defendants-Appellants Pauline Clay Hunter and Christopher Hunter appeal
the district court’s denial of their Emergency Ex Parte Application for a Temporary
Restraining Order (“TRO Application”) and remand of their action to state court
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We…