118 Ava, LLC v. Pauline Hunter

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202522-56115California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

118 AVA, LLC, No. 22-56115

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-08048-DDP-JPR v.

PAULINE CLAY HUNTER; MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER HUNTER,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Defendants-Appellants Pauline Clay Hunter and Christopher Hunter appeal

the district court’s denial of their Emergency Ex Parte Application for a Temporary

Restraining Order (“TRO Application”) and remand of their action to state court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.