Bondi
Nunes Torres-Melo v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-2126California1,435 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIA REGIANE NUNES TORRES- No. 23-2126 MELO; RAPHAELA FONSECA-DE Agency Nos.
MELO TORRES; YAGO FONSECA-DE A220-280-415
MELO TORRES, A220-280-416
A220-280-417
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***
Antonia Regiane Nunes Torres-Melo (“Nunes”) and her two children Yago
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…