Bondi

Nunes Torres-Melo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-2126California1,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIA REGIANE NUNES TORRES- No. 23-2126 MELO; RAPHAELA FONSECA-DE Agency Nos.

MELO TORRES; YAGO FONSECA-DE A220-280-415

MELO TORRES, A220-280-416

A220-280-417

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

Antonia Regiane Nunes Torres-Melo (“Nunes”) and her two children Yago

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.