Brisco

Brisco v. Shinn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-3331California1,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTJUAN BRISCO, No. 23-3331 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:20-cv-00260-JGZ v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 13, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.

Antjuan Brisco, an inmate in the custody of the Arizona Department of

Corrections (“ADC”), brought a pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

against several ADC officials. Brisco appeals both the district court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. dismissing his Title II Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claim at the

screening stage under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.