Bondi
Alvarez Ramirez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-3567California361 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
FEB 13 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YENNY ALVAREZ RAMIREZ, No. 23-3567
Petitioner, Agency No. A220-460-428
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Yenny Alvarez Ramirez petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an immigration judge (IJ)
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252, and we deny the petition for review.