Bondi

Alvarez Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-3567California361 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 13 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YENNY ALVAREZ RAMIREZ, No. 23-3567

Petitioner, Agency No. A220-460-428

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Yenny Alvarez Ramirez petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an immigration judge (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

With respect to asylum and withholding of removal, the BIA did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.