Bondi

Vasquez Trejo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-4446California971 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDNA GUADALUPE VASQUEZ No. 23-4446 TREJO; D.L.G.V., Agency Nos.

A209-984-253

Petitioners, A209-984-254 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

Petitioners Edna Guadalupe Vasquez Trejo and her minor child

(“Petitioners” or “Vasquez Trejo” when referring only to the lead petitioner),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.