Pineda-Ortiz
Pineda-Ortiz v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-4136California483 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEYRIN ESTUARDO PINEDA- No. 23-4136 ORTIZ; ENMA LEONOR AQUINO- Agency Nos.
HERNANDEZ; Y.L.P.A., A220-319-175
A220-319-127
Petitioners,
A220-319-126
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***
Enma Leonor Aquino-Hernandez (“Petitioner”), her spouse Deyvin Estuardo
Pineda-Ortiz (“Pineda-Ortiz”), and their minor child Y.L.P.A., natives and citizens
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.…