Pineda-Ortiz

Pineda-Ortiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-4136California483 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEYRIN ESTUARDO PINEDA- No. 23-4136 ORTIZ; ENMA LEONOR AQUINO- Agency Nos.

HERNANDEZ; Y.L.P.A., A220-319-175

A220-319-127

Petitioners,

A220-319-126

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

Enma Leonor Aquino-Hernandez (“Petitioner”), her spouse Deyvin Estuardo

Pineda-Ortiz (“Pineda-Ortiz”), and their minor child Y.L.P.A., natives and citizens

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.