Padilla-Sarmiento

Padilla-Sarmiento v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-4139California1,013 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODULIO ADONAY PADILLA- No. 23-4139 SARMIENTO, Agency No.

A096-386-723

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FORREST and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Rodulio Adonay Padilla-Sarmiento (“Padilla-Sarmiento”), a native and

citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.