Mirabadi
Mirabadi v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FARAH MIRABADI, individual and on No. 24-1487 behalf of a class of other similarly situated D.C. No. individual, 2:23-cv-06809-PSG-SP Plaintiff - Appellant,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,
a Utah Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 11, 2025** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Farah Mirabadi filed a putative class action against Select Portfolio
Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) for its alleged violation of (1) California’s Rosenthal Fair