Mirabadi

Mirabadi v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202524-1487California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FARAH MIRABADI, individual and on No. 24-1487 behalf of a class of other similarly situated D.C. No. individual, 2:23-cv-06809-PSG-SP Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,

a Utah Corporation,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 11, 2025** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Farah Mirabadi filed a putative class action against Select Portfolio

Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) for its alleged violation of (1) California’s Rosenthal Fair

Debt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.