Bondi
Lagunas Espinoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 202523-3883California830 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FABIAN LAGUNAS ESPINOZA; MARIA No. 23-3883 ANGELICA FLORES ULLOA; FABIAN Agency Nos.
LAGUNAS FLORES; MATEO LAGUNAS A220-589-087
FLORES, A220-589-088
A220-589-089
Petitioners,
A220-589-090
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Fabian Lagunas Espinoza, María Flores Ulloa, and their two children
(“Petitioners”) seek asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 An immigration judge denied their claims,
and the…