P.
P. v. Regla-Ramirez CA4/2
Opinion
DISCUSSION
Defendant appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to
represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement
of the case, a summary of the facts and potential arguable issues, and requesting this
court conduct an independent review of the record.
We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but
he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106,
we have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable
issues.
3
III
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
RAMIREZ
P. J.
We concur:
HOLLENHORST
J.
McKINSTER J.
4