P.

P. v. Regla-Ramirez CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2013E058084California132 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Defendant appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to

represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement

of the case, a summary of the facts and potential arguable issues, and requesting this

court conduct an independent review of the record.

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but

he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106,

we have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable

issues.

3

III

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

RAMIREZ

P. J.

We concur:

HOLLENHORST

J.

McKINSTER J.

4