Black v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20253:21-cv-01990California3,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LANCE BLACK, an individual, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01990-RBM-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

COMPLAINT

Defendants. [Doc. 77] 14 15 Currently before the Court is Defendants Sergeant Christina Berg (“Sergeant Berg”), Ryan Poole, Elizabeth Ortiz, Alyssa Tutterow, Amy Buell, Katherine Jennings, Jardin Killinger, Austin Fowler, Kyle Valente, Jonathan Wells, Diego Usma, David Burns, and Jose Rodriguez’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 12(b)(6), 12(f), and 41(b) (“Motion”). (Doc. 77.) Defendants move to dismiss the Thirteenth Claim of the TAC. (Id. at 2.1) Plaintiff Lance Black (“Plaintiff”) has filed an Opposition. (Doc. 85.) Defendants have filed a Reply. (Doc. 87.) Having considered the briefing, the Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.