Jose Hernandez v. Indymac Bank
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 201312-17669California219 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 09 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
JOSE E. HERNANDEZ, No. 12-17669
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00369-MMD-
CWH
v.
INDYMAC BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 8, 2013 **
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CANBY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his
request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying
preliminary injunctive relief, and we…