Jose Hernandez v. Indymac Bank

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 201312-17669California219 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 09 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

JOSE E. HERNANDEZ, No. 12-17669

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00369-MMD-

CWH

v.

INDYMAC BANK; et al., MEMORANDUM *

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2013 **

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CANBY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Jose Hernandez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his

request for preliminary injunctive relief against defendants. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying

preliminary injunctive relief, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.