Nozot

Nozot v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20253:24-cv-01171California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID NOZOT, Case No.: 24cv1171-DMS(LR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION TO CONTINUE [ECF NO. 22] WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 17 On February 13, 2025, the parties filed a “Joint Moton to Continue the Dates Set in the Court’s Scheduling Order.” (ECF No. 22.) They describe their discovery effort to date, and ask the Court to continue the deadline to complete fact discovery by thirty days so that they could complete remaining witness depositions. (ECF No. 22-1 at 2–4.) The parties further state that they “are actively meeting and conferring on discovery issues relating to electronically stored information (‘ESI’),” and ask the Court to continue by thirty days Plaintiff’s deadline to request an informal Discovery Conference (“IDC”). (Id.) A scheduling order “may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.