Sorour

Sorour v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20253:25-cv-00036California728 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SALLY SOROUR, Case No. 25-cv-00036-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING FEDERAL

v.

CLAIM AND REMANDING STATE

CLAIMS

PNC BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Sally Sorour sued Defendants PNC Bank, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America in California state court for allegedly failing to properly investigate a transaction she made that was the result of a fraudulent phone call she had received asking her for money. Compl. (dkt. 1-1) at 3–6. Plaintiff brought breach of contract claims against each defendant and further brought claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1770; and the federal Electronic Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693f. Id. Defendants removed the case to federal court, asserting federal question jurisdiction based on Sorour’s bringing of a cause of action under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. Not. of Removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.