Barton
Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLISON BARTON and JANA Case No. 3:24-CV-01332-GPC-SBC MORENO, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO Plaintiffs,
DISMISS
14 v. [ECF No. 15]
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE
COMPANY, a Delaware company, Defendant. 18 Plaintiffs brought several consumer protection claims against Defendant for allegedly misleading consumers about the presence of lead in Defendant’s tampon products. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. ECF No. 15. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, and Defendant filed a reply. ECF Nos. 20, 21. Based on the reasons below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. 26 27 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Allison Barton and Jana Moreno (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have sued Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company…