Norgard

Norgard v. Colvin

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20253:24-cv-02491California1,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CONSTANCE N., Case No.: 3:24-cv-02491-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 [Doc. No. 3] Defendant. 16 17 18

21 22 23 24

26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), “[o]pinions by the Court in [Social Security cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2022)] will refer to any non-government parties by 28 On December 30, 2024, Plaintiff Constance N. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) final decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“Complaint”). Doc. No. 1. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Doc. No. 3 (“IFP Application”). For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the IFP Application. I. DISCUSSION 8 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.