Andes
(HC) Popke v. Andes
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20251:24-cv-00779California1,117 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOUGLAS LOUIS POPKE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00779-EPG-HC
Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS AND
v. ALLOW PETITIONER TO PROCEED
WITH EXHAUSTED CLAIM
CHANCE ANDES,
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
Respondent. TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
16 Petitioner Douglas Louis Popke is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. As Petitioner’s first and second claims for relief are unexhausted, the undersigned recommends dismissing the unexhausted claims and allowing Petitioner to proceed with his exhausted sufficiency of the evidence claim. I. BACKGROUND On July 2, 2024, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 1.) On July 9, 2024, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as unexhausted. (ECF No. 6.) No response to the order to show cause…