Crestbrook Insurance Company v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20251:24-cv-01075California4,388 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRESTBROOK INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 1:24-cv-01075-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER v. (ECF No. 15)

THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY

COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, et al., Defendants.

16 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 17 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 18 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 19 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 20 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court 21 to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that 22 this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 23 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use 24 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 25 treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.