Ramirez

(HC) Foster v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20252:24-cv-02800California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DeEARL FOSTER, No. 2:24-cv-2800 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALDANA RAMIREZ, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without an attorney, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 28, 2024, this court filed an order requiring plaintiff to submit, within thirty days from the date of the order, either an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. ECF No. 3. Petitioner was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. Id. at 1. This order was mailed to petitioner’s address of record—at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”). Id. On November 25, 2024, the October 28, 2024 order was returned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.