Gibilisco

(PC) White v. Gibilisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20252:24-cv-02273California4,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILSON LEBRANDON WHITE, No. 2:24-cv-2273 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MIKE GIBILISCO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county prisoner who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. He has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.1 Also pending before the court are plaintiff’s third amended complaint (“TAC”), 2 motion 23 This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in monthly installments that are taken from the inmate’s trust account rather than in one lump sum. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a). As part of this order, the prison is required to remove an initial partial filing fee from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.