Norman Stenberg v. Michelle King

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202523-35617California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 14 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMAN STENBERG, No. 23-35617

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00239-SAB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHELLE KING, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley A. Bastian, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 10, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Norman Stenberg appeals from the district court’s decision affirming the

Acting Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability

benefits and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.