Ramirez-Bernal

Ramirez-Bernal v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202523-1963California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PEDRO RAMIREZ-BERNAL, No. 22-1614 Agency No. Petitioner, A218-146-691 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

PEDRO RAMIREZ-BERNAL, No. 23-1963 Petitioner, Agency No.

A218-146-691

v.

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: MILLER, LEE, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Pedro Ramirez-Bernal, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review

of two decisions issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). First,

Ramirez-Bernal seeks review of a BIA order that summarily dismissed his appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.