Larkins

United States v. Larkins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202523-3921California1,264 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3921 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00250-MO-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RODERICK LARKINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

After entering a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute heroin in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(b)(1)(C), Defendant Roderick Larkins

appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and for a Franks

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. A district court’s denial of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.