Rose

Rose v. King

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202524-1618California1,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAMONA J. ROSE, No. 24-1618 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-05172-DWC v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHELLE KING, ACTING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 12, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

Ramona J. Rose appeals the district court’s decision affirming the Acting

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.