Hathaway

Hathaway v. Santa Barbara Unified School District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202524-1457California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBA HATHAWAY, No. 24-1457 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-03218-MWF-KS v.

MEMORANDUM*

SANTA BARBARA UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Alba Hathaway is a young adult who attended schools in Santa

Barbara Unified School District (SBUSD) as a child. In high school, she

experienced mental health difficulties; in response SBUSD referred Hathaway to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). county mental health services and provided her with accommodations pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.