Wu
Wu v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202523-2458California362 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HANWEI WU, No. 23-2458 Agency No. Petitioner, A097-358-685 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Hanwei Wu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his second motion to reopen, as both
time- and number-barred under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7) and 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.2(c)(2). Wu contends he is entitled to equitable tolling, but does not
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). explain his 16-year delay in filing the motion. His assertions of ineffective
assistance of counsel…