Wu

Wu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 14, 202523-2458California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 14 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HANWEI WU, No. 23-2458 Agency No. Petitioner, A097-358-685 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Hanwei Wu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his second motion to reopen, as both

time- and number-barred under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7) and 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(2). Wu contends he is entitled to equitable tolling, but does not

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). explain his 16-year delay in filing the motion. His assertions of ineffective

assistance of counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.