Hornemann

Hornemann v. Shryock CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2025F087850California3,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 2/14/25 Hornemann v. Shryock CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIETER HORNEMANN,

F087850

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-23-103504) v.

WESLEY SHRYOCK et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Gregory A. Pulskamp, Judge. Dieter Hornemann, in Pro. Per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Meyers Nave, Adam U. Lindgren and Catherine L. Carlisle for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Dr. Dieter Hornemann (Hornemann), the plaintiff in this action who has been a self-represented litigant throughout these proceedings, appeals a judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained a demurrer to his complaint without leave to amend, which was brought by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.