Justino Rupard v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20253:23-cv-01357California428 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23CV1357-CAB (BLM) JUSTINO RUPARD; RONNIE RUPARD,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE MOTION

FOR PARTIAL STAY AND SETTING

v. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF No. 181] Defendants. 16 Currently before this Court is the Defendants’ Ex Parte Motion to Stay the Court’s Order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel that was issued on February 5, 2025. ECF Nos. 176, 181. Defendants are not seeking a stay of the Court’s Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) that was also issued in the February 5, 2025 Order. ECF No. 181 at 2. Counsel for Defendants represents that all parties have “stipulated to the requested relief and will not be opposing the ex parte motion.” Ainslie Decl. at ¶ 8, ECF No. 181-1. In the Court’s February 5, 2025 Order, this Court granted the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel on the ground that the Critical Incident Review Board (“CIRB”) documents were not protected by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.