Jaszczyszyn

Jaszczyszyn v. SunPower Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20253:22-cv-00956California3,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PIOTR JASZCZYSZYN, Case No. 22-cv-00956-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

SUNPOWER CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 108, 119 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants SunPower Corporation, Peter Faricy, and Manavendra S. Sials’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). This order assumes familiarity with the Court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), including that order’s recitation of the facts, the applicable legal standards, and the arguments made by the parties. See ECF 85 (“Order”). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND On January 20, 2022, SunPower announced that it was taking a $27 million warranty charge due to a “cracking issue that developed over time in certain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.