22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T464,3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GINA GOLDE CASE NO: 10 2:24−cv−08555−FMO−AJR Plaintiff(s), 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE SERVICES, INC. , et al. 13 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 19 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27 Dated The 14th of February 2025 /s/24:T489,

3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

GINA GOLDE CASE NO:

10 2:24−cv−08555−FMO−AJR Plaintiff(s), 11 v.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

12 SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE SERVICES, INC. , et al. 13 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, 18 IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs 19 and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30, to re-open the 20 action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction 21 over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure 22 to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline 23 set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the 24 action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 25 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). 26 27 Dated The 14th of February 2025 /s/