San Diego Coastkeeper v. United States International Boundary and Water Commission

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAN DIEGO COASTKEEPER, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-663-JES-VET

12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

13 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

14 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL

BOUNDARY AND WATER

15 [ECF No. 13] COMMISSION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17

18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Veolia Water West Operating Services, Inc.’s 19 (“Veolia”) motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, and Veolia filed 20 a reply.1 ECF Nos. 20, 23. On October 16, 2024, the Court held a hearing and took the 21 matter under submission. ECF No. 30. After due consideration and for the reasons 22 discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Veolia’s motion 23 to dismiss. 24 // 25 26 27 1 The other defendants in the matter, the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (“IBWC”) and Maria-Elena Giner in her official capacity as Commissioner of the IBWC, filed a response 28 1 I. …