San Diego Coastkeeper v. United States International Boundary and Water Commission

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20253:24-cv-00663California5,945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN DIEGO COASTKEEPER, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-663-JES-VET

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL

BOUNDARY AND WATER

[ECF No. 13] COMMISSION, et al., 16 Defendants.

18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Veolia Water West Operating Services, Inc.’s 19 (“Veolia”) motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, and Veolia filed 20 a reply.1 ECF Nos. 20, 23. On October 16, 2024, the Court held a hearing and took the 21 matter under submission. ECF No. 30. After due consideration and for the reasons 22 discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Veolia’s motion 23 to dismiss. 24 // 25 26 1 The other defendants in the matter, the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (“IBWC”) and Maria-Elena Giner in her official capacity as Commissioner of the IBWC, filed a response 28 I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.