Torres

(PC) Holland v. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20251:24-cv-00557California1,259 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THADIUS J. HOLLAND, Case No. 1:24-cv-0557 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST CLEMENT

OGBUEHI, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

GUADALUPE TORRES, et al., OF COURT TO UPDATE THE DOCKET Defendants. (Doc. 17) 16 Thadius J. Holland seeks to hold the defendants liable for deliberate indifference to his serious medical need following complications from a circumcision while housed at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility. (See Doc. 15.) The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Guadalupe Torres and Candice Gish. (Id. at 5-7.) However, the magistrate judge determined Plaintiff did not allege facts sufficient to state a claim against Clement Ogbuehi. (Id. at 6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action proceed only on the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.