(PC) Hill v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20251:24-cv-01284California4,093 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAWN CODY HILL, No. 1:24-cv-01284-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

ACTION Defendants. (ECF No. 8) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on October 22, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On December 9, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the December 9, 2024 order. Therefore, on January 21, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.