Smith v. George Brown Fitness

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20251:24-cv-01561California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01561 JLT SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

GEORGE BROWN FITNESS, et al., COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE

Defendants. (Doc. 5)

16 Candace Smith seeks to hold the defendants liable for racial profiling, sexual harassment, and for an injury suffered while using a jacuzzi sauna. (See generally Doc. 1.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 5.) The magistrate judge found the Court lacks diversity jurisdiction, because all identified defendants are citizens of California. (Id. at 4.) In addition, the magistrate judge determined the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, because “Plaintiff fails to specify a federal statute or constitutional doctrine that gives rise to her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.