Ashley Clarke v. Orange County Social Services Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20258:24-cv-02755California6,887 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 12, 2024, Ashley Clarke (“Plaintiff”) filed a pro se civil rights complaint raising constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law tort claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) allows district courts court to grant plaintiffs leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and waive the filing fee if they cannot afford it. However, the statute also requires the court to “dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that” the case is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court has reviewed the operative Complaint (Dkt. 1) and, for the reasons explained below, finds that it fails to state a claim against any of the Defendants. The Complaint is therefore dismissed with leave to amend.

II. SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT

A. Factual Allegations. Plaintiff is suing the County of Orange (“County”), which operates the Orange County

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-02755-MWC-KES Date: February 14, 2025 Page

Social Services Agency (“SSA”), and five social workers employed by SSA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.