(PC) Calloway v. Naphcare Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, No. 2:24-cv-02446-DJC-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER

NAPHCARE INC., et al.,

Defendants.

On October 2, 2024, Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney issued a screening order dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff now seeks reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge’s order. (ECF No. 8.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a party may object to a non- dispositive order issued by a Magistrate Judge within fourteen days of the order being served. Non-dispositive orders of a Magistrate Judge are subject to the “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); see also L.R. 303(f). “A magistrate judge's decision is contrary to law if it applies an incorrect legal standard, fails to consider an element of an applicable standard, or fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law, or rules of procedure.” Aerojet…