Webb

Webb v. Nextera Energy Marketing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20252:24-cv-02816California2,333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM WEBB, No. 24-cv-02816-DC-CSK Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER NEXTERA ENERGY MARKETING, LLC, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 16) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS Defendants state they may file a third-party complaint for contribution against Plaintiff’s employer, Titan Renewables, for its failure to properly train…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.