Doe
Doe v. Grindr Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN DOE, an individual, No. 24-475 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02093-
ODW-PD
v.
GRINDR INC.; GRINDR LLC,
OPINION
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 3, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed February 18, 2025
Before: Jay S. Bybee, Sandra S. Ikuta, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta SUMMARY *
Communications Decency Act
The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal, as barred by § 230 of the Communications Decency Act, of an action brought by an underage Grindr application user against Grindr Inc. and Grindr LLC, alleging sex trafficking in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act and causes of action under state law. Under § 230, interactive computer service providers are immune from state law liability when plaintiffs seek to treat those providers as publishers of third-party content. The panel held that § 230 barred the plaintiff’s state law claims…