Bondi

Haro Mendoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-1976California562 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISRAEL HARO MENDOZA, No. 23-1976 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-446-428 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, TALLMAN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Israel Haro Mendoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his administrative

appeal from an order of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and cancellation of removal under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.