Bamaca-Juarez

Bamaca-Juarez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-2021California513 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUMBERTO PATROCINIO BAMACA- No. 23-2021 JUAREZ; GRISELDA FLORINDA Agency Nos.

BAMACA-AMBROCIO, A201-554-151

A201-554-152

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.*** Humberto Patrocinio Bamaca-Juarez and his daughter as rider-derivative

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. petition for review of an order from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.