Waldeck

United States v. Waldeck

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-2235California643 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FEB 18 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2235

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 9:22-cr-00059-DWM-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DAVID LOREN WALDECK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 10, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.**

David Waldeck appeals from his conviction for possession of controlled

substances with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Waldeck challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence

and its decision to admit expert testimony on drug prices. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.