Dibee

United States v. Dibee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-3866California842 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3866 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 6:22-cr-00134-MC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSEPH DIBEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 5, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Joseph Dibee pleaded guilty to one violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 844(f) and (n), conspiracy to commit arson. Defendant’s plea agreement

included mandatory restitution. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663 and 3663A, the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court imposed a restitution order of $82,497.60 without interest to be paid

to the United States Bureau of Land Management. Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.