Larry Johnson v. Thomas Brenneke, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-35542California937 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LARRY JOHNSON, No. 23-35542
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:21-cv-00582-JR 3:21-cv-00685-JR v. 3:21-cv-00871-JR
THOMAS BARRY BRENNEKE, Jr.; et al.,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Jolie A. Russo, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Johnson,1 proceeding pro se, appeals the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 In his opening brief, Plaintiff erroneously identifies five cases as being at issue here and lists “Michelle Hume” as another Plaintiff-Appellant. But in the…