Larry Johnson v. Thomas Brenneke, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-35542California937 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LARRY JOHNSON, No. 23-35542

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:21-cv-00582-JR 3:21-cv-00685-JR v. 3:21-cv-00871-JR

THOMAS BARRY BRENNEKE, Jr.; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Jolie A. Russo, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Larry Johnson,1 proceeding pro se, appeals the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 In his opening brief, Plaintiff erroneously identifies five cases as being at issue here and lists “Michelle Hume” as another Plaintiff-Appellant. But in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.