Bondi

Jimenez Melo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202523-3823California1,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIEGO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ No. 23-3823 MELO; YINNA PAOLA GOMEZ Agency Nos.

PERILLA; NICOL VALERIA CLAROS A240-247-106

GOMEZ; SAMUEL ALEJANDRO A220-961-630

JIMENEZ GOMEZ; SARA ALEJANDRA

A220-961-631

JIMENEZ GOMEZ,

A220-961-632

A220-961-633

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.