Jonas

United States v. Jonas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 202524-5057California1,749 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5057 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:17-cr-00050-HZ-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CODY JOE JONAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial dissent by Judge BEA. Defendant-Appellant Cody Joe Jonas appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In the

context of sentencing reductions, the U.S. Supreme Court has assumed, for the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sake of argument, that “district courts have equivalent duties when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.