Jonas
United States v. Jonas
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-5057 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:17-cr-00050-HZ-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
CODY JOE JONAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: BEA, KOH, and SUNG, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial dissent by Judge BEA. Defendant-Appellant Cody Joe Jonas appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). In the
context of sentencing reductions, the U.S. Supreme Court has assumed, for the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sake of argument, that “district courts have equivalent duties when…