People v. Grunow CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2025B327660California5,153 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 2/18/25 P. v. Grunow CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B327660 (Super. Ct. No. 21F-05749) Plaintiff and Respondent, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

CRAIG ANTHONY GRUNOW,

Defendant and Appellant.

Craig Anthony Grunow appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of sexual intercourse with a child (Kaitlyn) who was 10 years old or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (a)),1 and 10 counts of lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 years: four counts as to Kaitlyn, two counts as to Kylee, and four counts as to Thea. (§ 288, subd. (a).) For each of these 10 counts, the jury found true an allegation that appellant was convicted in the present case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.