Gross

Gross v. Sandy CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 2025B333161California1,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/18/25 Gross v. Sandy CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

JAMES GROSS, 2d Civ. No. B333161 (Super. Ct. No. 22CV-0077) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

MARY VIXIE SANDY, as Executive Director, etc. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

James Gross appeals a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandate. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)1 We conclude that the trial court’s findings rest upon substantial evidence and affirm. (Fukuda v. City of Angels (1999) 20 Cal.4th 805, 824; County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement (1988) 46 Cal.3d 902, 910.)

All statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mary Vixie Sandy,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.